ebotCPA — The Entrepreneur's CPA

    Can a newborn be an employee for tax purposes?

    Check the claim against the cited law, its limits and the records needed to support your next step.

    The claim: “A newborn can be a legitimate employee of your business for tax savings.”

    False — the payroll exemption requires real work

    Reviewed by Ebot Mbi, CPA, EA · Last reviewed · Law and figures current as of September 17, 2026

    How it works

    01

    Check the claim

    Separate the specific promise from the facts and conditions it leaves out.

    02

    Review the law

    Read the controlling statute, regulation, IRS guidance, or court decision linked below.

    03

    Choose a supported action

    Use the rules that fit your records and circumstances; do not rely on a slogan.

    Which sounds like you?

    Terms used in this guide

    A deduction reduces taxable income; a credit reduces calculated tax; deferral changes when tax is due.

    The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) is federal tax law; Treasury regulations explain its rules; IRS publications explain the agency's guidance.

    S corporation:
    a corporation with an election generally passing tax items to shareholders.
    reasonable compensation:
    pay supported by the services an owner performs.
    exclusion:
    an amount the applicable law permits you to leave out of taxable income.
    Roth:
    a retirement account type with after-tax contributions and conditional tax treatment for withdrawals.
    IRA:
    an individual retirement arrangement.

    What the law says

    No. IRC §3121(b)(3)(A) excludes from Social Security and Medicare taxes service performed by a child under 18 employed by a parent, which applies to a parent's sole proprietorship or a partnership owned only by the child's parents. The exemption applies to wages for actual services.

    A newborn performs no services, so there is no employment and no wages for the exemption to cover.

    Primary sources

    26 U.S.C. §3121(b)(3)(A). Family employment excluded from FICA.

    “service performed by a child under the age of 18 in the employ of his father or mother”

    Excludes a child's service for a parent from FICA employment.

    IRS, Family Employees (Small Business/Self-Employed). Child employed by parents.

    “Payments for the services of a child under the age 18 are not subject to social security and Medicare taxes.”

    Explains the exemption, the qualifying business structures, and the FUTA exemption for children under 21.

    26 U.S.C. §162(a)(1). Deduction for compensation for services.

    “a reasonable allowance for salaries or other compensation for personal services actually rendered;”

    Limits the wage deduction to reasonable pay for services actually rendered.

    26 U.S.C. §3306(c)(5). Family employment excluded from FUTA.

    Excludes service by a child under 21 employed by a parent from FUTA employment.

    IRM 4.23.5. Technical Guidelines for Employment Tax Issues.

    Guides examiners on employment tax issues, including worker and wage questions.

    Rev. Proc. 2025-32. 2026 standard deduction amounts.

    Sets the 2026 dependent standard deduction at the greater of $1,350 or earned income plus $450, up to $16,100.

    Alternative action and key takeaways

    • The FICA exemption applies to service performed by a child under 18 for a parent's sole proprietorship or parents-only partnership.
    • Wages paid by a corporation, including a family S corporation, do not qualify.
    • FUTA does not apply to wages paid to a child under 21 by a parent's qualifying business.
    • A newborn cannot perform services, so any payment is a gift, not wages.
    • Real work, reasonable pay, and records are the requirements for the legitimate version.

    Where the claim comes from

    The payroll tax exemption for children working in a parent's business is real, and it is often combined with the income tax benefit of the child's standard deduction. Some promoters take the idea to an infant, arguing that a baby can "model" for marketing or that the law has no minimum age. Neither argument turns a payment into wages for services.

    The claim is often paired with a suggestion to open a retirement account for the baby funded by the "wages." A Roth IRA contribution requires earned income, and payments that are not wages for services are not earned income. If the payment fails as wages, the contribution can become an excess contribution subject to a 6% annual excise tax under IRC §4973 until it is corrected.

    What the law actually says

    IRC §3121(b) defines employment for Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) purposes and excludes, in §3121(b)(3)(A), "service performed by a child under the age of 18 in the employ of his father or mother." The IRS explains that this applies when the child works for a parent's sole proprietorship or for a partnership in which each partner is a parent of the child. The IRS also states that payments for the services of a child under 21 are not subject to federal unemployment (FUTA) tax.

    The exclusion is for service performed in an employment relationship. Wages are pay for services, and the employer's deduction under IRC §162(a)(1) is limited to reasonable compensation for services actually rendered. A newborn cannot perform services, so there is no employment relationship, no wages, and no deduction.

    Examiners reviewing family payroll follow the employment tax guidance in IRM 4.23.5 and will ask what work was done, when, and how the rate was set.

    For income tax, the child's 2026 standard deduction is the greater of $1,350 or earned income plus $450, up to $16,100, under Rev. Proc. 2025-32.

    That benefit also depends on the income being earned income, meaning pay for work.

    What is true and what is not

    It is true that a parent's sole proprietorship can pay a child under 18 for real work without Social Security and Medicare taxes, and that the pay can be deductible to the business. It is true that the child's wages can be sheltered from federal income tax up to the standard deduction.

    It is not true that an infant can be an employee. Photographing a baby for marketing is a personal matter for the parent, not a job the baby performs. It is also not true that the exemption applies to an S corporation or C corporation owned by the parents; wages paid by a corporation are subject to FICA regardless of the employee's age.

    It is also not true that reporting the payment on a W-2 settles the question. A W-2 reports what an employer claims it paid for services. If the IRS finds that no services were performed, it can disallow the deduction, treat the payment as a personal transfer, and assess penalties, regardless of what forms were filed.

    • True: the FICA exemption exists for children under 18 in qualifying businesses.
    • True: FUTA does not apply to a qualifying child under 21.
    • Not true: a newborn can earn wages.
    • Not true: a family corporation qualifies for the FICA exemption.

    What to do instead

    If your children are old enough to work, give them real, age-appropriate tasks and document the work with a job description and timesheets. Pay a rate you can support by comparing it with what you would pay someone else. Run payroll, issue Form W-2, and deposit the pay into an account in the child's name.

    Confirm your business structure. If you operate as an S corporation, the FICA exemption does not apply to wages it pays, although the wages may still be deductible. Some families pay children through a separate sole proprietorship or parents-only partnership that has its own real business activity, which requires careful setup and records.

    Check state child labor rules, and keep the pay proportionate to the work. The IRS evaluates the whole arrangement, not only the paperwork.

    How ebotCPA helps

    We review whether your business structure qualifies for the family payroll exemption, set up payroll and time records for children who actually work, and check the pay rate against the work performed.

    Book a $497 Case Analysis to have Ebot Mbi, CPA, EA review your facts before you act.

    Payroll tax on $6,000 of wages for real work — worked example

    Assumptions: Tax year 2026; parent operates a sole proprietorship.; A 15-year-old child performs documented work and is paid $6,000.; Social Security tax 12.4% and Medicare tax 2.9% (employer and employee shares combined), below the $184,500 wage base.; Newborn comparison: no services performed.

    FICA on $6,000 paid to an unrelated employee ($6,000 × 15.3%)$918
    FICA on $6,000 paid to the owner's 15-year-old child$0
    Child's 2026 standard deduction ($6,000 + $450)$6,450
    Child's federal taxable income from the wages$0
    Wages a newborn can earn$0

    For a working teenager, $918 of FICA that would apply to an unrelated worker does not apply; for a newborn there are no wages and nothing to exempt.

    Illustration only; not a projection of your results.

    Frequently asked questions

    Does my S corporation qualify for the child payroll exemption?

    No. The exemption applies to a parent's sole proprietorship and to a partnership in which each partner is a parent of the child. Wages from a corporation are subject to FICA.

    Can my baby be paid for appearing in ads?

    Payments by an unrelated company for a child's modeling work are the child's income. Paying your own baby from your business for appearing in your own marketing is not wages for services in any practical sense and invites disallowance.

    Does the child need a W-2?

    Yes. A child who is a real employee receives a Form W-2, even when the wages are exempt from FICA.

    At what age does the FICA exemption end?

    It applies to service performed while the child is under 18. The FUTA exemption continues until age 21.

    Want the detail?

    Free — Free Notice Decoder / free path. Pull your own IRS transcripts (free through your IRS Online Account at IRS.gov) and send them to us. Our notice engine reads them and gives you a free report on what they show. Requires your written §7216 consent. $97 — Notice Review. Send us your IRS notice along with your own transcripts. We tell you what the notice is, what it means, and what the issues appear to be at a high level. This is information, not tax advice. $497 — Case Analysis. We pull your transcripts, analyze your whole situation, and give you a written do-it-yourself plan. $1,000 — Representation. Power of attorney (Form 2848) and we represent you before the IRS. Flat $1,000. The $97 Notice Review is credited toward the $497 Case Analysis. Fixed fees, confirmed in writing before work begins. Not a guarantee of any IRS outcome. We never charge a percentage of tax saved.

    General information, not tax, legal, or investment advice for your situation. Results depend on your facts; no outcome is guaranteed. Reading this page does not create a client relationship.

    Ebotagborndang Mbi, CPA d/b/a ebotCPA · Ebot Mbi, CPA (Texas License #127163), Enrolled Agent · 4425 W Airport Fwy, Ste 595, Irving, TX 75062

    Last updated: