Review the notice and payroll
We check the levy, hearing deadline and the amount protected from withholding.
A wage levy sends part of each paycheck to the IRS, and a documented request can ask the IRS to release it.
We check the levy, hearing deadline and the amount protected from withholding.
We review income, expenses and payment options, then prepare the records supporting a release request.
We contact the IRS, respond to questions and, if release is approved, confirm the employer receives it.
A wage levy is an IRS instruction to your employer to send part of your pay toward unpaid tax. Form 668-W (Notice of Levy on Wages, Salary, and Other Income) is issued under IRC §6331(a) and §6331(e). Unlike a bank levy on Form 668-A, it continues each pay period until released under IRC §6343.
The amount protected from levy comes from IRS Publication 1494 and depends on filing status, dependents and pay frequency. IRC §6334(a)(9) refers to the personal exemption amount under IRC §151(d), divided by pay periods. The employer uses the Statement of Dependents and Filing Status in Part 3 of Form 668-W.
The existing 2026 example in Publication 1494 (Rev. 12-2025) is $1,646.16 protected per bi-weekly pay period for someone married filing jointly with two dependents. Pay above that amount is subject to the levy. If Part 3 is not returned within three business days, the employer uses married filing separately with zero dependents.
A payment arrangement, hardship request, offer or appeal may support relief, depending on the facts. An offer in compromise asks the IRS to accept less than the full balance; submitting one does not itself release an existing wage levy. The IRS must decide the applicable release request and send Form 668-D to the employer.
IRC §6343(a)(1)(A)–(E) and Treas. Reg. §301.6343-1(b) identify five grounds requiring release when their conditions are met. We document the relevant ground; the IRS determines whether the conditions apply.
IRC §6343(a)(1)(A); Treas.
Reg. §301.6343-1(b)(1).
Release applies when the liability has been paid, abated (reduced or canceled), or become unenforceable.
We check account transcripts and each tax period’s collection statute expiration date, the deadline for collection under the generally 10-year period in IRC §6502.
IRC §6343(a)(1)(B); Treas.
Reg. §301.6343-1(b)(2).
Release may help when a payment agreement, offer or property sale would produce a better collection result.
This can apply where the levy prevents earning the income needed to pay.
IRC §6159; IRC §6343(a)(1)(C); Treas.
Reg. §301.6343-1(b)(3).
The levy must be released after a qualifying written installment agreement, unless the agreement says otherwise.
The existing streamlined example is a balance at or under $50,000 with all required returns filed under IRM 5.14.5, generally without full financial disclosure; approval and release must be confirmed.
IRC §6343(a)(1)(D); Treas.
Reg. §301.6343-1(b)(4).
Economic hardship means an individual cannot pay reasonable basic living expenses because of the levy.
Current income and expense evidence on Form 433-A or Form 433-F supports the request.
IRC §6343(a)(1)(E); Treas.
Reg. §301.6343-1(b)(5).
A partial release is required when the property value substantially exceeds the liability and release would not endanger collection.
This is less commonly the main ground in a wage case.
In Vinatieri v. Commissioner, 133 T.C. 392 (2009), the Tax Court held that hardship release is not conditioned on having filed every required return. Future arrangements may still require filing compliance. The hardship ground applies to individuals, not corporations or other business entities.
IRC §6343(e) separately requires wage-levy release as soon as practicable after an agreement that the tax is not collectible. Currently not collectible (CNC) status means the IRS has determined the taxpayer cannot currently pay. It does not cancel the tax debt.
Under IRC §6343(a)(1) and IRM 5.11.2.3, we file Form 2848, the power of attorney, and contact the Automated Collection System (ACS), Field Collection or the assigned revenue officer.
We supply Form 433-A or Form 433-F and supporting records; IRM 5.11.2.3.1 addresses documented hardship.
The existing same-business-day to 5-day estimate is not a promise; after approval, Form 668-D must reach the employer and payroll processing determines when withholding changes.
Form 911 requests assistance when normal IRS channels have not addressed significant hardship.
IRC §7811 and Treas.
Reg. §301.7811-1 authorize a Taxpayer Assistance Order, an instruction requiring IRS action in qualifying circumstances.
The existing 24–72-hour estimate is not a promised release time; the advocate and IRS evaluate the facts under IRC §6343(a)(1)(D).
Letter 1058 or Letter LT11 generally allows 30 days from the date printed on the notice to request a hearing, not the date received.
Timely Form 12153 filing generally suspends covered collection under IRC §6330(e)(1) and preserves Tax Court review under IRC §6330(d)(1).
Filing alone does not release an existing levy, and Appeals consideration may take weeks.
Under IRC §6159, a qualifying installment agreement can support release under IRC §6343(a)(1)(C), unless the agreement provides otherwise.
The existing streamlined 1–3-day estimate under IRM 5.14.5 is not a commitment; required returns and current eligibility must be checked.
We confirm both the agreement and the release rather than assume either has occurred.
If the 30-day hearing deadline is missed, an Equivalent Hearing under Treas. Reg. §301.6330-1(i)(2) may be requested within one year, without the same judicial review rights. A direct release request under IRC §6343 is separate from that deadline.
Ebot Mbi, CPA, EA holds Texas CPA license #127163 and IRS Enrolled Agent status, federally authorized by the U.S. Department of the Treasury under Circular 230. CPAs, Enrolled Agents and attorneys may represent taxpayers in IRS administrative matters. The office is at 4425 W Airport Fwy, Ste 595, Irving, TX 75062.
A straightforward single-tax-year case generally requires less work than multiple years or a complex collection-deadline analysis. Missing returns may require a separate tax preparer; a Collection Due Process appeal adds Appeals work. The engagement letter defines the scope and fee.
The fee and scope are confirmed in the written engagement letter before IRS contact.
Case Analysis is $497 regardless of balance owed, tax years, complexity or urgency. The $97 Notice Review is credited toward the $497 Case Analysis. Phase 2 work is priced in the published ranges on our IRS fee page, or quoted in writing after the Case Analysis. Fixed fees, confirmed in writing before work begins. Not a guarantee of any IRS outcome. We never charge a percentage of tax saved.
The engagement letter controls the work; no specific outcome or timeline is guaranteed. Outcomes depend on the facts, IRS procedures and applicable law. Texas CPAs are bound by the rules of the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy.
Under IRM 5.11.2.3, a direct release request can be considered when the financial records support a release ground; the IRS decides.
Same-business-day action and 24–72 hours for Form 911 assistance under IRC §7811 are timing examples, not promised release times; hardship is assessed under IRC §6343(a)(1)(D).
If approved, the IRS sends Form 668-D to the employer, whose payroll processing affects when withholding changes.
A timely Collection Due Process (CDP) request under IRC §6330 generally suspends covered collection, but Appeals consideration may take weeks and filing does not itself release an existing levy.
Yes — and this is settled law.
In Vinatieri v.
Commissioner, 133 T.C. 392 (2009), the U.S.
Tax Court held that the IRS must release a levy creating economic hardship under IRC §6343(a)(1)(D) even if the taxpayer has not filed all required tax returns.
The court reasoned that neither §6343 nor Treas.
Reg. §301.6343-1(b)(4) conditions hardship release on filing compliance.
The IRS may still require filing as part of any going-forward agreement — but it cannot use unfiled returns as a basis to refuse hardship release.
We routinely cite Vinatieri in hardship release requests.
Treasury Regulation §301.6343-1(b)(4) defines economic hardship as a situation where satisfaction of the levy in whole or in part will cause an individual taxpayer to be unable to pay his or her reasonable basic living expenses.
Reasonable basic living expenses are determined using the IRS Allowable Living Expense (ALE) standards — published nationally and by county.
The Tax Court has held that economic hardship release applies to individual taxpayers only — not corporations or business entities — and requires complete, current financial substantiation through Form 433-A or 433-F.
The IRS exempts the amount calculated under IRC §6334(a)(9), based on the personal exemption amount under IRC §151(d), divided by your number of pay periods per year.
Publication 1494 (Rev. 12-2025) publishes the exact tables for 2026.
Example: a taxpayer who is married filing jointly, paid bi-weekly, and claims two dependents is exempt at $1,646.16 per pay period; everything above that amount goes to the IRS.
If you did not return the Statement of Dependents and Filing Status (Part 3 of Form 668-W) within three business days, your exemption was calculated at the minimum — married filing separately with zero dependents.
30 days from the date printed on the notice to request a hearing — not the day it reached you.
If you missed it, two paths remain.
First, the Equivalent Hearing under Treas.
Reg. §301.6330-1(i)(2) is available within one year of the levy notice — Appeals will hear your case under the same standards, though without Tax Court review rights.
Second, the direct release request under IRC §6343 is not dependent on CDP timing and remains available at any time.
Many cases that miss the CDP window are resolved through direct §6343 release without any CDP filing.
It depends on the form of the payment.
Continuous wage levy under IRC §6331(e) applies to salary, wages, and other compensation for services in a work relationship — including commissions paid in a recurring employment relationship.
The Fourth Circuit confirmed continuous-levy treatment for insurance-commission earners in United States v.
Jefferson-Pilot Life Ins.
Co., 49 F.3d 1020 (4th Cir. 1995).
For pure independent-contractor payments (1099 income with no fixed and determinable right to future payment), the IRS typically serves Form 668-A, which reaches only the payments due at the moment of service — not future earnings.
Last updated:
We use optional Google Analytics cookies only with your permission. Analytics stays off on sensitive tax pages. Choose Accept or Decline.
